This debate was a much more difficult one than the one with Michael Shermer. (see the post on that debate from the atheist who thought Andrew Copson is really intelligent, well-informed, an excellent publicist, very reasonable and comes across very well. I felt that I was stretched to my limit and, perhaps because it was my second debate of the morning, I felt that I let him away with too much, allowed him to avoid a lot, and sometimes did not answer all that well. To be honest, and I hate to admit this, but I probably did get this one wrong. However I will live and learn.